Legal Opinion

Webber v. Randall

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Saginaw. (Edget, J.) Bill for relief from a contract on the ground of nonperformance by the defendant, and for the appointment of a receiver. Complainant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, C. J.

This is a bill and cross-bill. In the original bill the complainant, Webber, states that he entered into a contract with Randall, which recited that Randall was the owner of certain lands in Saginaw county, Mich., which he desired to stock with Holstein-Fresian cattle, and that, complainant being the owner of such cattle, the parties agreed together that complainant's cattle should be taken by Randall, and placed upon his farm in Saginaw county, fed and cared for at Randall's expense, and that the milk and butter from said cattle should be-the property of Randall, to dispose of as he might…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Caswell v. ComstockMichigan Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ritzer v. RitzerMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Webber v. RandallMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Hardesty v. NaharkeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API