St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. Ray
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Noble County: A. H. Huston, Judge. « Action by John W. Ray against the St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Company and E. J. Miller. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring' error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
GALBRAITH, C.
This action was for damages on account of personal injuries received by the defendant in error, John W. Ray, by falling into a pit on the land of the railway company, made by. its tenant, Miller. There was a trial to the court and a jury, and a verdict returned for the plaintiff against both of the defendants, upon which judgment was rendered, and from which both the railway company and its tenant appeal.
It appears that: The St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Company built into the city of Perry, after the city was located and established, and that the company building…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Swords v. . EdgarNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Crogan v. SchieleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885
- City of Norwich v. BreedSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1862
- Graves v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Louisville & N. R. Co. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1930
- Concho Const. Co., Inc. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas CoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
- Sinclair Texas Pipe Line Co. v. RossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Adams v. TolertonDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1927
- M. & D. Motor Freight Lines v. KelleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.