Legal Opinion

People v. Staton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1989PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We disagree with defendant’s contention on appeal that the evidence of knowing possession was legally insufficient to sustain his convictions of one count each of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first and third degrees, two counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and one count of unlawful possession of *961marihuana. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People, and giving it the benefit of every reasonable inference (see, People v Tejeda, 140 AD2d 985, affd 73 NY2d 958), we find that there…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. TejedaNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. People v. TejedaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API