Tysenn v. Johns-Manville Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LUONGO, District Judge.
This is an asbestosis action in which Owens-Illinois was named as an original defendant, and later made the target of various crossclaims by some of its co-defendants. Owens now moves for summary judgment against all parties, principally on the ground that it was the employer of plaintiff Anthony Tysenn, and therefore under the applicable compensation laws cannot be liable to any of the parties.
I. Owens’ Motion Against Plaintiff Anthony Tysenn
A. Choice of Law
A threshold issue is the law to be applied. Owens contends that New Jersey law controls, while the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Ayers v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Anthony v. Koppers Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Falzone v. BuschSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Bell v. Koppers Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Millison v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Mergenthaler v. Asbestos Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- Ayers v. Jackson Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
- Nutt v. A.C. & S., Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1983
- Amendola v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.