Kanaga v. Gannett Co., Inc.
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
VEASEY, Chief Justice:
In this appeal we conclude that one who publishes defamatory material about a non-public figure does not necessarily enjoy First Amendment protected speech status as a matter of law when that material is expressed in terms of an opinion. Here, a physician claims to have been libeled by a patient-defendant who presented defamatory material to the media-defendants who published the material. The defendants claim that the material was opinion and, as such, is protected speech. We hold that summary judgment was improperly granted in favor of defendants where the defamatory…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Rosenblatt v. BaerSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Ramunno v. CawleySupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
- Doe v. CahillSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- United Vanguard Fund, Inc. v. TakeCare, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1997
- Gannett Co., Inc. v. KanagaSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
- Gail Bierman and Beth Weier v. Scott Weier and Author Solutions, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2013
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.