Legal Opinion

Hoffbauer v. Morgan

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1909No. 21,365PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From Marion Circuit Court (15,583) ; Henry Clay Allen, Judge.' Application by Joseph R. Morgan and others for the probate of the will of Assenath Showalter, deceased, to which Yiola IToffbauer objects. From- a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

Appellees proposed for probate the alleged will of Assenath Showalter, deceased, to which appellant filed verified objections. Appellant’s objections averred: (1) that the testatrix was of unsound mind; (2) that the instrument was unduly executed; (3) that the execution of the pretended will was procured (a) by the undue influence of Miriam Gerhardt; (b) by the undue influence of appellee Morgan; (c) by fraud; (4) that the pretended will was not executed by the testatrix, nor by others in her presence or with her knowledge or consent. Appellees filed a general denial to these charges, and the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wenning v. TeepleIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Burkhart v. GladishIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Cline v. LindseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Teegarden v. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Steinkuehler v. WempnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1907

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gwinn v. HobbsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Pence v. MyersIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Harbison v. BoydIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Voyles v. HindsIndiana Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LambertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API