Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Texas Commerce Bank-Austin, National Ass'n

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 23, 1992No. 3-92-120-CVPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEA ANN SMITH, Justice.

Hartwin Ray Peterson, Jr., appeals an adverse summary judgment rendered against him in a deficiency suit on a promissory note. Peterson sought to avoid liability for the debt by pleading the affirmative defense of limitations. At issue is whether, under Texas common law, the pendency of a federal bankruptcy proceeding tolls the applicable state statute of limitations. Holding that it does, we will affirm the district-court judgment.

FACTS

Peterson executed a promissory note that Texas Commerce Bank-Austin, N.A. (the “Bank”), came to own and hold. The note had a final…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Woods v. William M. Mercer, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Zale Corporation v. RosenbaumTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Hughes v. Mahaney & HigginsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Weaver v. WittTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Pettibone Corporation v. Carl EasleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Thurman v. TafoyaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  2. HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v. Kenneth CrumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  3. Lawrenson v. Global Marine, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1993
  4. Raley v. Lile, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1993
  5. Swoboda v. Wilshire Credit Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API