Roncoroni v. Gross
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, Rudolph Gross and another, doing business under the firm name and style of The American Conserve Company, from an/order of the Supreme Court, made at the Hew York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 23d day of December, 1903, adjudging the defendants guilty of a criminal contempt of court in. disobeying an order entered in this action on the 30th day of Hovember, 1903.
1Opinion of the Court
Van Brunt, P. J.:
Throughout the papers in this case the orders are spoken of as being the orders of the justice who directed their entry. It will be *367observed that they were not judge’s orders, but orders of the court, and should have been styled as such, they not being orders of the justice, but of the court over which he presided.
•On the 30th of November, 1903, an order was entered in this action enjoining and restraining the defendants during its pendency and until the further order of the court from in any manner using the words “ Conserva Di- Tomate ” as a description of any tomato…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Steingut v. ImrieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
- People ex rel. Bernstein v. La FetraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- State Ex Rel. Voorhees v. SyckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938