Legal Opinion

Muller v. Bardshar

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1922No. 16642PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Island county, Bell, J., entered May 6, 1921, upon findings in favor of the defendants, after a trial to the court upon stipulated facts, in an action for equitable relief.

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

— This is a suit in equity, brought by appellants to enjoin respondents from selling an automobile mortgaged by appellants’ vendor, L. A. Morse, to respondent Bardshar.

On June 24, 1920, respondent Bardshar, at Seattle, Washington, sold the car in question to one L. A. Morse, a resident of Bellingham, Whatcom county. At that place and time, Morse paid Bardshar a portion of *253the purchase price and gave back a chattel mortgage on the car for the balance of the unpaid purchase price. In the chattel mortgage it was stipulated that the mortgagor would not remove the property from the county of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. AllenWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Stitt v. Spengel House Furnishing Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1914
  3. Turner v. CaldwellWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  4. First National Bank v. Northwest Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Merritt v. Russell & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Morgan v. Stanton Auto Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. Schneller v. VincentWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Inland Finance Co. v. Inland Motor Car Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
  4. North Pacific Bank v. Pacific Mercantile Agency, Collectors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API