Legal Opinion

Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Bank of America

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 20, 1974No. 73-1579PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM E. DOYLE, Circuit Judge.

The sole question presented in the above appeal is whether the District Court correctly ruled that the Bank of America, appellee here, had effectively opted out as a member of the plaintiff class in a class action brought pursuant to Rule 23(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The trial court in a memorandum and order held that the Bank effectively elected to remove itself from the class and that it was not entitled to share in the settlement which had been arranged on behalf of the class and was not bound by the provisions of the judgment entered…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bonner v. Texas City Independent School Dist. of TexasDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1969
  2. John M. Coady v. Aguadilla Terminal Inc., and the Home Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
  3. Supermarkets General Corp. v. Grinnell Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973
  4. Vandervelde v. Put & Call Brokers & Dealers Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Four Seasons Securities Laws LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  2. Demint v. Nationsbank Corp.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API