People v. Harshaw
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLING, J. pro tem.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction of assault with intent to commit rape. The case was tried without a jury and the sole attack on the judgment is that it is not supported by the evidence.
In support of the judgment we must assume that the trial court believed the evidence most favorable to the judgment rendered and drew any reasonable inferences from that. evidence which would support the court’s finding of defendant’s guilt. (People v. Perkins, 8 Cal.2d 502, 510-511 [66 P.2d 631]; People v. Green, 13 Cal.2d 37, 42 [87 P.2d 821].)
*148Defendant (a petty officer in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- People v. SelbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- People v. BollingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- People v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- State v. MeyerWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- People v. McMonigleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- People v. NyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- People v. AlotisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.