Legal Opinion
Amerada Petroleum Corporation v. Bettye M. Marshall
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided July 31, 1967No. 24019PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge:
This appeal is from an order of the district court refusing to hear a petition for declaratory judgment. We affirm.
In 1948 appellant Amerada Petroleum Corporation, Continental Oil Company, and Marathon Oil Company agreed to organize jointly Coronada Petroleum Corporation whose purpose would be to acquire oil properties outside the United States. One Arthur A. Curtice was employed as the president of Coronada and he received as compensation a participating interest in properties acquired by Coronada during his employment. Curtice assigned to appellee Bettye Marshall…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. QuarlesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
- Public Affairs Associates, Inc. v. RickoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Crosley Corp. v. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Factors Etc., Inc. And Boxcar Enterprises Inc. v. Pro Arts, Inc. And Stop and Shop Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- William S. Manuel v. Convergys CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Mission Insurance Company v. Puritan Fashions CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Ven-Fuel, Inc. v. Department of TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Morgan Drexen, Inc. v. Consumer Financial Protection BureauCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.