Legal Opinion

Agostinacci v. Brooklyn City Railroad

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided November 16, 1931PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSweedler, J.

Motion by plaintiffs in actions 1 and 2 to consolidate all three actions for the purpose of trial.

It is conceded that all three actions involve the same transaction, the same witnesses, and all three are jury cases. Pasqual Agostinacci is suing in her own behalf for the damages resulting from the alleged negligence of the defendant’s servants; Michael Agostinacci is suing for the damages he has suffered by reason of such alleged negligence of defendant in the loss of his wife’s services and moneys expended for her care; the third action is brought by the Brooklyn City Railroad Company to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dilworth v. Yellow Taxi Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  2. Gillin v. CanaryAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1897

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Navarro v. MartinUnited States District Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API