Legal Opinion · Dissent

Nadal v. Childs Securities Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 23, 1963Published

1Dissent

Eager, J. (dissenting).

I would reverse the order of Special Term. From the record here, it is clear that there are issues of fact precluding the summary dismissal, as a matter of law, of the complaint at this time.

This action was brought to recover for a breach by the defendant of contracts whereby, as the buyer of land in Florida, he is alleged to have agreed to pay plaintiff a finder’s fee and also to employ plaintiff to supervise the construction of an apartment house upon the premises and to pay him for his services in this connection 5% of the cost of construction plus a fee of 1% to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Curry v. MacKenzieNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Nassoiy v. . TomlinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Nau v. Vulcan Rail & Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1941
  4. Kirchner v. New Home Sewing MacHine Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Hudson v. Yonkers Fruit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API