Nadal v. Childs Securities Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Eager, J. (dissenting).
I would reverse the order of Special Term. From the record here, it is clear that there are issues of fact precluding the summary dismissal, as a matter of law, of the complaint at this time.
This action was brought to recover for a breach by the defendant of contracts whereby, as the buyer of land in Florida, he is alleged to have agreed to pay plaintiff a finder’s fee and also to employ plaintiff to supervise the construction of an apartment house upon the premises and to pay him for his services in this connection 5% of the cost of construction plus a fee of 1% to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Curry v. MacKenzieNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Nassoiy v. . TomlinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Nau v. Vulcan Rail & Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Kirchner v. New Home Sewing MacHine Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Hudson v. Yonkers Fruit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.