Cosby v. Jackson
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. *
Earlier proceedings, see 625 F.Supp. 619 (N.D.Ill.1985), affirmed in part and reversed in part, 843 F.2d 967 (7th Cir.1988), left this case in potential need of a second trial to determine whether the state’s procedures for adjudicating claims for extended unemployment benefits complied with the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment. The parties decided that settlement would be preferable to extended combat, and they negotiated a consent decree concluding most of the case.
This decree provides that the Illinois Department of Income Security shall…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Alabama v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Green v. MansourSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- unempl.ins.rep. Cch 22,027 Bonita Paschal v. Sally Jackson, Director of the Illinois Department of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Ridlen v. Four County Counseling CenterDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1992
- Roberts v. SamardvichDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1995
- Thomas v. BrownDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1993
- Grooms v. CaldwellDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.