Legal Opinion
Schill v. McGrath
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 20, 1950PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.
This is an action brought under Section 9 of the Trading With the Enemy Act, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1 et seq., to recover property vested by the Alien Property Custodian during World War II. Both’ parties have moved for summary judgment.
Plaintiff was associated from 1930 to 1942 in ascending degrees of importance with the Nirosta Corporation, a Delaware corporation originally known as Krupp-Nirosta Corp., organized in 1928 for the purpose of holding and licensing the use of stainless steel patents which were owned by the Fried. Krupp, A. G. of Essen, Germany.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Morrison v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Colby v. KluneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Miller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Cummings v. Deutsche Bank Und DiscontogesellschaftSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Guessefeldt v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Guessefeldt v. McGrathDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1950
- Guessefeldt v. McGrath as Successor to the Alien Property CustodianCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Craig v. BohackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
- Guessefeldt v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.