Legal Opinion
Guessefeldt v. McGrath
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 14, 1950No. 5153-49PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TAMM, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings this action for return of property seized under the “Trading With The Enemy Act”, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1 et seq., hereinafter referred to as the Act. The Government having moved to dismiss thereby concedes the following well pleaded facts:
Plaintiff was born in Germany in 1870 and moved to Hawaii in 1896 where he has since resided. In April 1938 plaintiff, accompanied by his wife and daughter, who is a citizen of the United States, left Hawaii for a trip to Germany. Permits were issued to them to re-enter the United States, which permits, as extended,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Markham v. CabellSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Morris v. GilmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Clark v. Uebersee Finanz-Korp., AGSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Cummings v. Deutsche Bank Und DiscontogesellschaftSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Orville E. Stifel, II v. William F. Hopkins, Esq.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
- Guessefeldt v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- The H. Schumacher Oil Works, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Public Administrator v. McGrathDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Guessefeldt v. McGrath as Successor to the Alien Property CustodianCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.