Legal Opinion

S.P. Duggal Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 29, 1996PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.), entered on or about January 11, 1995, which denied plaintiff insureds’ motion for a retransfer from the Civil Court to Supreme Court and for leave to amend the complaint to increase the ad damnum clause, unanimously modified, on the facts, to grant the motion for a retransfer, and to grant the motion to amend as against defendant Gotham Brokerage Company, Inc. ("Gotham”) only, and otherwise affirmed without costs.

Although leave to amend to pleadings "shall be freely given” (CPLR 3025 [b]), here the IAS Court properly declined to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fahy v. Hertz Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Bachtinger v. YeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. S.P. Duggal Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Moore v. AllenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API