Legal Opinion

Zemo v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 2, 1994No. 1742, September Term, 1993PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOYLAN, Judge.

The appellant, Joseph Phillip Zemo, was convicted by a Carroll County jury of the breaking and entering of a gasoline station and related charges. On this appeal, he raises four contentions:

1) that the trial court erroneously admitted evidence that the appellant had remained silent after receiving his Miranda warnings;

2) that the trial court erroneously received hearsay evidence that the investigating detective had received information from a confidential informant that led him to the appellant;

3) that the evidence was not legally sufficient to sustain the convictions; and

4)…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Younie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  4. Duckett v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  5. Burko v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Leonard v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Newman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  3. Parker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  4. Hall v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  5. Emory v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API