Zemo v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MOYLAN, Judge.
The appellant, Joseph Phillip Zemo, was convicted by a Carroll County jury of the breaking and entering of a gasoline station and related charges. On this appeal, he raises four contentions:
1) that the trial court erroneously admitted evidence that the appellant had remained silent after receiving his Miranda warnings;
2) that the trial court erroneously received hearsay evidence that the investigating detective had received information from a confidential informant that led him to the appellant;
3) that the evidence was not legally sufficient to sustain the convictions; and
4)…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Younie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Duckett v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- Burko v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Leonard v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2001
- Newman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Parker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Hall v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Emory v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.