Legal Opinion
Smith v. County of Humboldt
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 15, 2003No. C 01-3689 SIPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ILLSTON, District Judge.
On September 28, 2001, plaintiff, Mary L. Smith, filed an employment discrimination complaint against County of Humboldt, alleging that she was subject to sexual harassment by her coworker Denise Grimes, shortly after both began training for positions as Eligibility Workers for the Humboldt County Department of Social Services. On October 4, 2002 this Court heard argument on defendant’s motion for summary judgment based on plaintiffs failure to (1) establish a prima facie case of sexual harassment and (2) file a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Burch v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2006
- Banga v. First USA, NADistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. California Psychiatric Transitions, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2009
- Mann v. LimaDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2003
- Amy Aquino v. Leprino Foods CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2026
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.