Legal Opinion

Almini Co. v. King

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 4, 1900PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Assumpsit, for damages for a failure to comply with the terms of a contract. Error to the County Court of Cook County; the Hon. H. W. Johnson, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1899.

1Opinion of the Court

Mu. Justice Freeman

delivered the opinion of the court.

Defendant in error sued to recover damages for the failure of plaintiff in error to comply with the terms of an alleged contract in writing, by which it is said to have agreed to do the painting and glazing upon a house in process of construction. Judgment was rendered in favor of defendant in error, from which an appeal was prayed, which was dismissed for want of a complete record. The cause now comes up on a writ of error.

Plaintiff in error submitted to the architect an estimate of the “ cost of painting, varnishing, etc.,” according to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. HessionsIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Daube v. TennisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  3. American Vault, Safe & Lock Co. v. SpringerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bowser, Inc. v. Hamilton Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API