Legal Opinion
Steel & Tube Co. of America v. Dingess Rum Coal Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided January 13, 1925No. 2264PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOODS, Circuit Judge.
The main issue in the District Court was whether the defendant was liable on its contract with the plaintiff for 10 per cent, royalty on coal used and not sold. This issue was decided in favor of the plaintiff. The decree fixed the number of tons upon which the royalty was due and the liability of the defendant for 10 per cent, of the market value thereon over $1 a ton. As a necessary preliminary to a final judgment, the decree directed a special master to ascertain the market value of the coal, and, upon the basis oí: that value, report the amount due by the defendant.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McGourkey v. Toledo & Ohio Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Keystone Manganese & Iron Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Beebe v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
- Rexford v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Lodge v. TwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Miller v. Pyrites Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
- Cox v. Graves, Knight & Graves, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
- Miller Hatcheries, Inc. v. Buckeye Incubator Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- Dodge Mfg. Co. v. PattenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1930
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. TurbyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.