Legal Opinion

Oregonians in Action v. Land Conservation & Development Commission

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 8, 1990No. 90-028; CA A64796PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

Petitioner seeks review of LUBA’s dismissal, for lack of jurisdiction, of their appeal from LCDC’s adoption of amendments to Goal 4 and related administrative rules. The amendments were adopted pursuant to ORS 197.245:

“The commission may periodically amend the initial goals and guidelines adopted under ORS 197.240 and adopt new goals and guidelines. The adoption of amendments to or of new goals shall be done in the manner provided in ORS 197.235 and [ORS] 197.240 and shall specify with particularity those goal provisions that are applicable to land use decisions before plan revision. Absent a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Pendleton v. KernsOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Wagner v. Marion CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Marks v. LCDCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  2. Oregonians in Action v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. Oregon Shores Conservation Coalition v. Lincoln CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API