Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Hinds

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 11, 1986No. 85-1672PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAUM, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff, Charles R. Elliott, appeals from the district court’s dismissal of the portions of his claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the defendant state officials, in their individual capacity, that were based on the Fourteenth Amendment and the dismissal of his pendant state action for defamation. The district court found that the defamation actions and the plaintiff’s request for “retroactive injunctive relief” were not cognizable because of the Eleventh Amendment. This appeal is another in what has become an increasingly long line of cases in which this circuit…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Trevor Carten v. Kent State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  2. Hamid R. Kashani v. Purdue UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  3. Douglas Power v. Phillip M. SummersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,913 Asset Allocation and Management Company v. Western Employers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  5. Dotson v. GriesaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API