Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. to Ming v. Commissioner of Immigration
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 12, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PATTERSON, District Judge.
This is a writ of habeas corpus calling for the review of an order of deportation made by the Secretary of Labor.
To Ming is of the Chinese race. He came to the United States in December, 1924, having with him the merchant’s certificate required by section 6 of the Act of May 6,1882, as amended (8 USCA § 265). He was examined and admitted under bond as “an alien entitled to enter the United States solely to carry on trade under and in pursuance of the provision of a present existing treaty of commerce and navigation” (Act May 26, 1924, § 3 (6), 8 USCA § 203 (6).
In…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Bilokumsky v. TodSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Yee Won v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Ex Parte Wong Gar WahCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
- Jeu Jo Wan v. NagleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Zurbrick v. TraicoffCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kumaki Koga v. BerkshireCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- Sugaya v. HaffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- Chung Yim v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- United States ex rel. Coco v. HughesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1934