Legal Opinion

Jeu Jo Wan v. Nagle

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 7, 1925No. 4677PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order denying a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The appellant applied for admission to the United States, basing Ms application on a teacher certificate issued pursuant to section 6 of the Act of May 6, 1882 (22 Stat. 60), entitled “An act to execute certain treaty stipulations relating to Chinese,” as amended by the Act of July 5, 1884 (23 Stat. 116 [Comp. St. § 4293]). The certificate states, among other things, that the present occupation of the appellant is that of teacher, and that he had pursued that occupation for about four years.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. May v. SloanSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Cheung Sum Shee v. NagleSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Toxaway Hotel Co. v. Smathers & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. National League of Professional Baseball Clubs v. Federal Baseball Club of Baltimore, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1920
  5. Foo v. WeedinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dang Foo v. DayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  2. In Re PezziDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1928
  3. United States ex rel. to Ming v. Commissioner of ImmigrationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
  4. Tatsumi Masuda v. NagleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
  5. Dang Foo v. DayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API