Legal Opinion
Netzley v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 22, 2008No. E040033PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McKINSTER, J.
Petitioner, Phillip Netzley, moved to dismiss criminal charges pending against him because of an alleged violation of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (LAD). (Pen. Code, 1 § 1389.) The trial court denied the motion to dismiss, and petitioner filed for a writ of mandate.
The issue presented in this case is whether petitioner was “unable to stand trial, as determined by the court having jurisdiction of the matter,” within the meaning of the LAD, while he was serving a term of disciplinary segregation ás the result of his repeated misconduct and violence in prison. We…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fex v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Thomas NesbittCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kevin James COLLINS, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Joel Robert ScheerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- People v. LincolnColorado Court of Appeals · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. NguyenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022