Legal Opinion

United States v. Polson

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 5, 1951No. 29893PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, District Judge.

This is an action under the Housing and Rent Act of 1947, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 1881 et seq. The plaintiff seeks restitution of alleged overcharges in the rental of a four room apartment (designated “Apartment 8”) in San Francisco, California, and an injunction against further violations of the Acts and Regulations. Defendant disputes the legal maximum rent for the accommodations, contending that Apartment 8 had been decontrolled under Section 204(b) of the Act.

The facts, which were not in dispute, were as follows: Apartment 8 was originally registered in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Woods v. Oak Park Chateau CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
  2. Woods, Housing Expediter v. MacKenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
  3. United States v. PorhownikCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Boan v. MillerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. Burton v. MarattaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API