Legal Opinion

Corrado v. Hedrick

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided January 31, 2006No. 05-P-287PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrasso, J.

In this appeal, we consider the constraints on a judge’s power to award relief under G. L. c. 209A. We conclude that when, at a contested hearing, a plaintiff fails to prove that “abuse” has occurred, a judge may not continue an ex parte order that directs the defendant to vacate and remain away from the household because of subjective concerns that violence may occur if both remain in the same household.2

*4781. The ex parte orders. On Friday, August 20, 2004, Christine Corrado filed complaints for protection under G. L. c. 209A, with accompanying affidavits, that sought abuse prevention orders…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Frizado v. FrizadoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  2. Commonwealth v. GordonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. BoucherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  4. Zullo v. GoguenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  5. Wooldridge v. HickeyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ginsberg v. BlackerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
  2. Commissioner of Probation v. AdamsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
  3. Smith v. SmithMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
  4. C.R.S. v. J.M.S.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2017
  5. Commonwealth v. HousenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API