Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided August 17, 2006No. 05-P-283PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCowin, J.

We address again efforts to obtain relief in difficult personal circumstances within the limited provisions of G. L. c. 209A (governing certain acts between family or household members that constitute “abuse” as therein defined). The defendant, Stephen Jones, appeals from both an ex parte abuse *130prevention order and a subsequent extension order that required that he refrain from contact with the plaintiff, Mary Smith. He asserts that the evidence was insufficient in each proceeding to support a finding of abuse as contemplated by the statute, and consequently that the judges below lacked…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Salim Aoude v. Mobil Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  2. Police Commissioner v. Municipal Court of Dorchester DistrictMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  3. Frizado v. FrizadoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  4. Iamele v. AsselinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  5. Commonwealth v. RobicheauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. MacDonald v. CarusoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  2. E.C.O. v. ComptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  3. Gassman v. ReasonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
  4. Smith v. JonesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
  5. Allen v. AllenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API