Finch, Van Slyck, McConville v. Jackson
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion
On Petition for Behearing.
Burke, J.
The defendant has filed a petition for a rehearing, insisting that the real property sold belonged to the estate of Peter Margach, that the interest of the defendant and appellant is as an heir, and that under the decision of Crosson v. Kartowitz, 43 N. D. 466, 175 N. W. 868; Young v. Salzer Lumber Co. 32 N. D. 685, 204 N. W. 8, tbe levy was illegal. Second, that where land is in different tracts and sold en masse the period of redemption does not begin to run until after the sale is confirmed.
The notice of motion is silent on the question of ownership, but…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Power v. LarabeeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
- Crosson v. KartowitzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
- Young v. Salzer Lumber Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1925