Legal Opinion

Finch, Van Slyck, McConville v. Jackson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1928Published

1Opinion

On Petition for Behearing.

Burke, J.

The defendant has filed a petition for a rehearing, insisting that the real property sold belonged to the estate of Peter Margach, that the interest of the defendant and appellant is as an heir, and that under the decision of Crosson v. Kartowitz, 43 N. D. 466, 175 N. W. 868; Young v. Salzer Lumber Co. 32 N. D. 685, 204 N. W. 8, tbe levy was illegal. Second, that where land is in different tracts and sold en masse the period of redemption does not begin to run until after the sale is confirmed.

The notice of motion is silent on the question of ownership, but…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Power v. LarabeeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Crosson v. KartowitzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Young v. Salzer Lumber Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API