Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Minor

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1982No. 13526PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLMAN, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict in favor of appellee, Richard Armstrong, in a personal injury action. We affirm.

Appellee was fifty years old at the time of trial. In 1974, he injured his back in an accident while operating a snowcat en route to a work site in Wyoming. As a consequence of that injury appellee underwent surgery involving a bone fusion from the fourth lumbar vertebra to the first sacral vertebra. He was left with a permanent fifteen percent functional disability or limitation of motion. After surgery he began an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thomas v. St. Mary's Roman Catholic ChurchSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Koenig v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Dehn v. ProutySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stover v. Lakeland Square Owners Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  2. O'Riley v. RogersSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013
  3. Rego Co. v. McKown-KatySupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  4. Department of Social Services Ex Rel. Wolf v. McCartySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Val Robichaud and Thomas Robichaud v. Genevieve TheisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API