Legal Opinion
Guillory v. Farrar
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 18, 1966No. 1600PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Judge.
This is a workmen’s compensation suit instituted by Joseph Guillory against W. A. *159Farrar and G. L. Malone. Judgment on the merits was rendered by the trial judge condemning defendant Farrar to pay compensation benefits to plaintiff, but rejecting plaintiff’s demands against the remaining defendant, Malone. Plaintiff has appealed.
The first question presented is whether the relationship which existed between plaintiff and Malone at the time of the accident was such that Malone is or may be responsible to plaintiff under the Louisiana Workmen’s Compensation Act. Plaintiff contends…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kline v. DawsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
- Stevens v. MitchellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
- Redding v. CadeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
- Smith v. Crossett Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
- Jones v. HennessySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Freechou v. Thomas W. Hooley, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
- Broussard v. Heebe's Bakery, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
- Burns v. American Mutual Liability Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
- Hart v. RichardsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
- Andrus v. FarrarLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.