Legal Opinion
Middleton-Coulibaly v. Danco, Inc.
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided January 20, 2011Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Donald A. Miles, J.
Defendant Banco, Inc.’s motion to dismiss is denied, and its request to limit plaintiff’s damages is also denied. Defendant *954New York City Housing Authority’s motion to dismiss1 is granted and plaintiffs complaint against it dismissed.
Plaintiff commenced an action to recover for property damage sustained in a fire, allegedly as a result of negligence by defendants, which occurred at her home on August 29, 2001, while renovations were being conducted in her apartment by defendant Banco, Inc. (hereinafter Banco), a contractor of defendant New York City…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Pierson v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- First National Bank of Jacksboro v. LasaterSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- David A. Morlan v. Universal Guaranty Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Dynamics Corp. of America v. Marine Midland Bank-New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Security Pacific National Bank v. EvansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.