Legal Opinion

Bendetson v. Moody

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Mecosta. (Palmer, J.) Submitted on briefs April 4, 1894. Decided June 2, 1894. Trover. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

McGrath, O. J.

Plaintiff, claiming to be the purchaser of a stock of goods from one Eighmy, brings trover against the sheriff, who seized the stock under a writ of attachment, at the suit of Swartout & Downs against Eighmy. The latter had a stock of goods, the estimated value of which was from $2,000 to $2,500. He was indebted to various parties in the sum of over $2,000. Within a month prior to the transfer of the property, a number of his checks, varying in amount from $18 to $215, had been dishonored and protested for non-payment, and a number of drafts, varying in amount from $14 to $142,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Keena v. United Railroads of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Cavanagh v. Township of RiversideMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Boyle v. WalshMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API