Legal Opinion · Dissent

Solon v. MIDWEST MEDICAL RECORDS ASS'N

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 10, 2008No. 1-07-2723Published

1DissentJustice Greiman

I respectfully dissent from the majority.

“In giving effect to the statutory intent, the court should consider, in addition to the statutory language, the reason for the law, the problems to be remedied, and the objects and purposes sought.” General Motors Corp. v. State of Illinois Motor Vehicle Review Board, 224 Ill. 2d 1, 13 (2007). Moreover, when interpreting a statute, we must presume that the legislature did not intend to produce absurd, inconvenient or unjust consequences as a result of the law. Brucker v. Mercola, 227 Ill. 2d 502, 514 (2007).

I conclude that the language of the statute…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. MikuschIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Brucker v. MercolaIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  3. General Motors Corp. v. State of Illinois Motor Vehicle Review BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Ramirez v. Smart Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  5. Pratt v. Smart Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API