Legal Opinion
McClendon v. McCall
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 5, 1971No. 43074PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRWIN, Justice:
The Court of Appeals, Division No. 2, reversed the judgment of the trial court and remanded the cause for a new trial. On certiorari, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Plaintiff in error (plaintiff), an employee of defendants, commenced this action to recover damages allegedly sustained as a result of a slip and fall accident on defendants’ premises. The cause was submitted to the jury and it failed to reach a verdict because it became “deadlocked”. The'trial court then sustained defendants’ motion for judgment on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Buck v. Del City Apartments, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Fuller Ex Rel. Fuller v. NeundorfSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Small v. ComerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Clemens v. St. Louis S. F. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Sullins v. MillsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Krokowski v. Henderson National Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Tate v. RiceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
- Williams v. Tulsa MotelsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. IrwinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Krokowski v. Henderson National Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.