Legal Opinion

Lusky v. Keiser

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1913PublishedCited by 12 opinions

FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from Chancery Court of Davidson County. —Jrro. Allison, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Williams

Complainants, husband and wife, executed to one Loventhal, a seal estate agent, a contract authorizing the latter to sell a tract of land belonging to the wife. *707Acting under that contract, Loventhal opened negotiations with defendant, Keiser, who agreed to purchase The instrument executed to the real estate agent by complainants, so far as pertinent, is quoted, as follows :

“We, Louis Lusky and Lettie Lusky, hereby authorize and empower Dorris S. Loventhal, a real estate dealer in Nashville, Tennessee, to sell for us our farm, containing 106 acres, more or less in the 12th civil district of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Grafton v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Ullsperger v. MeyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Haydock v. . StowNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  4. Lee v. CherryTennessee Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Davis v. BrighamOregon Supreme Court · 1910

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cellco Partnership v. Shelby CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
  2. Huffine v. McCampbellTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Patterson v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1945
  4. Badger v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933
  5. MacKnight v. PanseySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API