Legal Opinion

Horton, Gilmore, McWilliams & Co v. Bloedorn

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1893No. 4914PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from the district court of Platte county. Tried below before Post, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, Ch. J.

Oh tlie 14th day of May, 1888, Daniel J. Maher and Martin Maher were engaged as a copartnership, under the firm name of D. J. Maher & Co., in the business of retail dealers in general hardware at Platte Center, Nebraska, and were indebted to the plaintiffs, Horton, Gilmore, McWilliams & Co., in the sum of $1,201.11. At about 2 o’clock P. M. on that day one Van Brunt, as the agent of the plaintiffs, applied to the defendants at their place of business in Platte Center for the payment or security of plaintiffs’ claim. Martin Maher, one of the members of the firm, was absent from…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sullivan v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Galusha v. ShermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Bond v. KiddCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  3. Lustgarten v. JonesNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Hargreaves v. KorcekNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Blalock v. BarrettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API