Legal Opinion

Rhodes v. Mound City Gas, Coal & Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 9, 1909No. 16,168PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from Linn district court; Walter L. Simons, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The plaintiff brought suit to restrain the defendants from interfering with his possession, use and enjoyment of a gas-well to which he claimed the paramount right. The court found the facts and determined the law in favor of the defendants, and the plaintiff prosecutes error.

The title of the defendants rests upon a mineral lease given by the owner of the land on which the well is .situated, Henry Carbon, to one Robert Fleming, on June 18, 1902. The defendants claim this lease was duly assigned to them and is still in force, unforfeited. If…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blodgett v. Lanyon Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  2. Rose v. Lanyon Zinc Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  3. Curtiss v. . HowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  4. Mower v. SanfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bailey v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Epperson v. HelbronSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  3. United States v. ReisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  4. Bloom v. RughSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  5. Brunson v. Carter Oil Co.District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API