Glaze v. Stryker
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Cottonwood county to determine adverse claims to real estate. The answer of Mary E. Stryker alleged that she was the owner in fee of part of the premises described. The case was tried before Nelson, J., who made findings and ordered judgment in favor of plaintiff. From an order denying her motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Action to determine adverse claim to real estate. Plaintiff’s source of title is a tax proceeding. The defendant Mary E. Stryker holds the government title. Plaintiff’s title was sustained and defendant appeals.
But few of the many legal questions raised by the appeal need be determined. Plaintiff’s asserted title originates in a tax judgment entered March 22, 1906, against the land in controversy for the 1904 delinquent taxes, and a sale had thereunder May 14, 1906, when it was bid in for the state. On August 20, 1910, the county auditor executed a certificate, assigning the interest acquired…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Downing v. LucySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Culligan v. Cosmopolitan Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Foster v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Foster v. CliffordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Spear v. NoonanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Absetz v. McClellanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- F. H. Wellcome Co. v. County of MarshallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928