Legal Opinion

F. H. Wellcome Co. v. County of Marshall

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 18, 1928No. 26,674PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Plaintiff appealed from the judgment entered upon an order sustaining a demurrer to its complaint upon the ground that neither cause of action alleged states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

At the annual tax sale May 14, 1923, plaintiff purchased certain tax liens for 1921 taxes. Thereafter plaintiff paid and had entered on the copy tax judgment book as a part of the lien of the respective tax certificates issued to it at said tax sale certain subsequent delinquent taxes. This was the basis of the first cause of action.

At the annual tax sale May 10, 1920, the Yellow Medicine…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Foster v. MalbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  2. Downing v. LucySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  3. Blakeley v. L. M. Mann Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  4. Fry v. County of MorrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  5. Forbes v. StreamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Anderson v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. State Bank of Mora v. BillstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API