Legal Opinion

Desrosiers v. Mag Industrial Automation Systems, LLC

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided December 23, 2009No. Civil WDQ-07-2253PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUSAN K. GAUVEY, United States Magistrate Judge.

Dear Counsel:

Pending before the court is the scope of permissible discovery of other incidents involving G & L products in this product liability case. See Motion to Modify Discovery Order or, in the Alternative, for Extension of Time. (Paper No. 109). For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part the motion.

Plaintiffs brought this case pleading negligence, breach of warranty, and strict liability counts. (Paper No. 4-2). Specifically, plaintiffs assert that decedent “was operating near the point of operation of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United Oil Co. v. Parts Associates, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2005
  2. John E. RYE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BLACK & DECKER MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  3. Fine v. Facet Aerospace Products Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Eramo v. Rolling Stone LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2016
  2. Sky Angel U.S., LLC v. Discovery Communications, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
  3. Adelman v. Boy Scouts of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2011
  4. Marfork Coal Co. v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2011
  5. Bender v. Josef Wiegand GmbH & Co. KGDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API