Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Hamalainen

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 1, 2003No. 2-02-0004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Malley

Defendant, Greg Hamalainen, appeals from his sentence of conditional discharge following his open plea of guilty to the offense of operating a motor vehicle with a blood-alcohol concentration in excess of 0.08 (625 ILCS 5/11 — 501(a)(1) (West 2000)). Defendant contends that the circuit court of Lake County erred by holding, pursuant to section 5 — 6—1(d)(1) of the Unified Code of Corrections (Code of Corrections) (730 ILCS 5/5 — 6—1(d)(1) (West 2000)), that a sentence of supervision was precluded as a result of his 1987 conviction of driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) in the State…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. County of Racine v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
  2. Ryan v. KatzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  3. People v. FinleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. People v. KraftAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  5. Mull v. Kane County Forest Preserve DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. PecoraSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  2. People v. HoferAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  3. State v. PecoraSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API