Legal Opinion

Mull v. Kane County Forest Preserve District

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 10, 2003No. 2-02-0283PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McLAREN

Defendant, the Kane County Forest Preserve District (forest preserve), appeals the jury verdict finding the forest preserve liable for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff, Janet Mull, when she fell while riding on the forest preserve’s bike trail. We reverse.

The following facts are taken from the record. During the afternoon of September 6, 1999, plaintiff fell from her bicycle after encountering a rut in the Great Western Trail, a path that traverses 17 miles of the forest preserve. The rut was located about 50 yards west of the Hidden Oaks Bridge. Plaintiff sustained injuries due to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Michigan Avenue National Bank v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In Re Estate of DierkesIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Evans v. ShannonIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Goodwin v. Carbondale Park DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  5. Elane v. St. Bernard HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McElroy v. Forest Preserve District of Lake CountyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  2. Martinelli v. The City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
  3. Cohen v. Chicago Park DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  4. Corbett v. County of LakeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016
  5. People v. HamalainenAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API