Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Brown

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 27, 1993No. 2-92-182-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LATTIMORE, Justice.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s denial of the relief requested in Brown’s Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus based on a claim of double jeopardy.

We affirm.

On Monday, March 30, 1992, Brown’s case was called for trial and a jury was seated and sworn by the court. However, because of the late hour, the proceedings were recessed until the following morning. On Tuesday, March 31, the court again called this case for trial. At that time, the State announced ready but Brown requested that the trial be continued until the following day. Brown s counsel had become…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  4. Illinois v. SomervilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Downum v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  2. Plunkett v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1994
  3. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  4. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API