Legal Opinion
Mears v. Marshall
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 10, 1997No. 9307-04839; CA A85078PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.
The Oregon Supreme Court remanded this case for further consideration in the light of Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr, 518 US_, 116 S Ct 2240, 135 L Ed 2d 700 (1996), which was decided by the United States Supreme Court after our decision in Mears v. Marshall, 137 Or App 390, 905 P2d 1154 (1995), on recons 138 Or App 476, 909 P2d 212 (1996), vac’d 324 Or 130, 921 P2d 966 (1996). The issue is whether various state tort claims are preempted by the Medical Device Amendments of 1976 (MDA) to the Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act, 21 USC § 301 et seq. In our previous decision, we concluded that a number of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Reserve National Insurance Co. v. Crowell Et UxSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Worthy v. Collagen Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Alton v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2013
- Vincent v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Brown v. Chas. H. Lilly Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.