Burkhalter v. Burkhalter

1. Where a general deposit of money in a bank, to bear interest at a specified rate from date, was not evidenced by the usual certificate of deposit or other writing fixing the time of payment, the statute *316of limitations did not begin to run in favor of the bank until demand for payment, “such demand not being delayed until the right had become stale.” In such a ease the claim could not be said to be barred as a matter of law where the demand was made six and one half years after the date of the deposit. Munnerlyn v. Augusta Savings Bank, 88 Ga. 333 (3) (14 S. E. 554, 30 Am. St. R. 159).

2.…