Pickard v. Gregory
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.
1. Grounds 4, 6, and 11 of the demurrer allege that the allegations of the petition relating to agency of the defendant’s husband are insufficient and too vague, indefinite, and generalized to support a cause of action. The petition alleges: “That the defendant, Evelyn Elaine Pickard by and through her agent, James S. Pickard, on or about April 12, 1951, obligated to pay petitioners. . . Petitioners further show that the defendant Evelyn Elaine Pickard received and retained the benefit of said fixtures, materials and work and labor as contracted for as aforesaid by and through her said agent,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Conney v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Suber v. BlackSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
- Rothberg v. Manhattan Coil Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Gibbs v. Carolina Portland Cement Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Herrington & Braswell v. GarlickCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chamberlin Co. of America v. MaysCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
- Georgia Insurance Service, Inc. v. WiseCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Mullinaux v. GilreathCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955