Legal Opinion

Shaw v. City of Rupert

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1984No. 14482PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON REHEARING

DONALDSON, Chief Justice.

A sewage lagoon system, designed by H & V Engineering, Inc., constructed by Galey Construction Co., and operated by the City of Rupert, is located immediately west of the real property owned by the plaintiffs, the Shaws and the Cranes. On March 16, 1979, one of the lagoons flooded, and the partially treated sewage flowed across the plaintiffs’ land for the distance of approximately IV2 miles. Based upon the alleged damages that occurred from the flooding, the plaintiffs brought this suit against the City of Rupert, H & V Engineering, Inc., and Galey…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smith v. Big Lost River Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Palmer v. Idaho Bank & Trust of KooskiaIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Boise Valley Construction Co. v. KroegerIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Alesko v. Union Pacific RailroadIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  5. McKinley v. FanningIdaho Supreme Court · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State of Idaho v. Hanna Min. Co.District Court, D. Idaho · 1987
  2. Matter of Estate of KeevenIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Marty v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Marty v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Cook v. Rockwell International Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API